![]() ![]() The starting team also gives the first clue. The team that starts has 6 Treasure Cards to identify, and the rival team has 5 Treasure Cards to identify. The color bars outside of the grid on any Key Card indicate which team starts (example circled above). The beige squares indicate neutral cards that do not belong to either team. ![]() Red squares indicate cards that the Red Team will try to identify, and blue squares indicate the ones for the Blue Team. The Key corresponds to the grid on the table. The Cluemasters choose a Key Card randomly and place it (any side up) on the stand between them. Pictures should be oriented so that the images face the guessers, and the word side should have the large words facing the guessers Key CardĮach game will use one Key Card that shows the location of the Treasure Cards for each team. It is recommended to use only all pictures or all words. The grid corresponds to the Easy Key Card that identifies to the Cluemasters which cards are assigned to their team (see page 4). Randomly choose 16 Treasure Cards and place them on the table in a 4x4 grid. Cluemasters sit on the same side of the table while the teammates (guessers) sit across on the opposite side. At least four players (making two teams of two) are recommended.Įach team chooses one player to be their Cluemaster. ![]() Players split up into two teams of similar size. Be careful! Decipher a code incorrectly and you might help the other team! It's a race to identify all your team's cards first! Components Treasure Cards their team is trying to find) to give clues in the form of code words telling their teammates where to find the cards. It's still deeply distasteful for a governor to target a private company because its leaders dared to criticize his policy choices-and DeSantis' handling of this situation should not become a model for other chief executives, no matter what the courts have to say about it.Two opposing teams are competing to be the first to identify all of their team's Disney Treasure Cards from among 16 cards displayed in a 4 x 4 grid.Įach team has a Cluemaster (who knows the location of each one of the Winsor says those actions don't meet the legal standard for being unconstitutional. Finally, in a Wall Street Journal op-ed last February, DeSantis explained that his administration's actions toward Disney were an attempt to "fight back" against the corporation's so-called "woke ideology" as expressed in Disney's criticism. In one passage, DeSantis writes that "things got worse for Disney" after the company criticized his policies. Meanwhile, DeSantis wrote extensively about his fight with Disney in his recent book, The Courage To Be Free, and leaves little doubt about how he approached the issue. "When Disney first came out against the bill…people in the legislature started floating this idea of going after Reedy Creek," DeSantis told The American Conservative in an interview published in May. We know this because DeSantis has said and written as much. Indeed, DeSantis may have prevailed within the letter of the law, but there is little doubt that his actions toward Disney were a direct response to Chapek's criticism. ![]() "If left unchallenged, this would set a dangerous precedent and give license to states to weaponize their official powers to punish the expression of political viewpoints they disagree with." "This is an important case with serious implications for the rule of law, and it will not end here," the company said in a statement. Meanwhile, Disney has vowed to appeal the ruling. In a statement, DeSantis' spokesman Jeff Redfern said Wednesday's ruling vindicated the governor's view that "Disney is still just one of many corporations in the state, and they do not have a right to their own special government." Disney, he wrote, "has not alleged any specific actions the new board took (or will take) because of the governor's alleged control." In Wednesday's ruling, federal Judge Allen Winsor wrote that Disney fell short of proving the retaliation claim. Disney claimed that DeSantis had engaged in a "relentless campaign to weaponize government power against Disney" in response to Disney's then-CEO Bob Chapek publicly criticizing DeSantis' approval of a law that restricted discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity in schools. In the lawsuit, Disney argued that DeSantis had unconstitutionally retaliated against the company by organizing a state takeover of the special taxing district that had been created in 1967 and covered the 25,000-plus acres now occupied by the Walt Disney World resort's theme parks, hotels, and various other facilities. Ron DeSantis on the grounds that the entertainment giant did not have sufficient standing to bring the First Amendment challenge. A federal judge dismissed Disney's lawsuit against Florida Gov. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |